We are asking if metaphor is a type of analogous title or perhaps is become famous about analogous name
A few of our very own foregoing factors promote credence towards contention one to metaphor are a keen analogous identity. This is exactly substantiated of the St Thomas’ process under consideration 13 regarding the new Prima Pars , since from inside the article around three, as he requires if any name is said properly of Jesus, new opposition produced to your gamble are anywhere between use proprie and you will improprie for the second understood that have metaphor. Upcoming, when you look at the post six, when he requires if labels well-known in order to God and you may animals is earliest told you away from creatures, brand new change proprie/improprie seems to be a beneficial subdivision away from analogous label. St Thomas begins by proclaiming that “into the omnibus nominibus quae de pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for every single respectum advertisement unum: et ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur for the definitione omnium. Mais aussi quia ratio quam significat nomen for each prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur in definitione aliorum, mais aussi each posterius de aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant ad illud primum vel magis vel without.” This is exactly exemplified because of the old reputable, “match.” “Sic for this reason omni nomina quae metaphorice de Deo dicuntur for each prius de creaturis dicuntur quam de Deo: quia dicta de Deo, nihil aliud extreme quam similitudines offer tales creaturas.” St. Thomas sees brand new similarity regarding ratio ( similitudo proportionum ) implied into the “smiling meadow” plus in calling Jesus a good lion.
When he goes on to speak out of most other brands “quae non metaphorice dicuntur de Deo,” this new clear impact is that he’s talking out of almost every other era off analogous labels than simply metaphors
Were there texts in which St Thomas opposes metaphor and you may example? If we look to the feedback to your Metaphysics , we find St Thomas pinpointing “potency” into analogous and you may equivocal modes. “Potency” setting several things. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum post quosdam analogiae.” The latest equivocal modes regarding potency was exemplified incidentally i speak of step three to the 3rd energy as well as the newest cube because the power of range. “Et propter hoc for each quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens inside quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens into the rem” Once more a great proportionality notice. These equivocal settings really are metaphors is obvious on synchronous passageway in book Delta within the commenting about what St Thomas initiate, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” Why are these settings metaphorical and never analogical? “His for this reason modis praetermissis, considerandum est de potentiis, quae reducuntur advertising unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, mais aussi omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur advertising aliquid principium legit paper writing services ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” Simply speaking, St Thomas here opposes metaphor in order to analogous spends from a name because the second and not the previous involve a decrease in order to what’s mostly denominated by phrase involved while, will be it you need mentioning, throughout the text message of Summa we considered a second ago, the latest metaphor was not recognized regarding the extension proprie on this foundation. Or is it the way of your regard to what is principally signifed because of the name hence differentiates metaphor away from example, need proprie away from improprie ? Things entitled metaphorically is, at all, brought to be similar to precisely what the term properly stands for.
Whatever you will likely be finding is some technique for justifying the fresh quite well-known improvement out of metaphor and you will analogy in a fashion that zero notice is designed to Cajetan’s office off analogy to your attribution and you will right proportionality
An aporia enjoys obviously emerged, therefore, and its particular resolution are only able to become had of the choosing exactly what an excellent metaphor is actually and just what a keen analogous name is. Answers to these concerns will be allow us to understand the appear to contradictory statements from Aquinas.